There's been a lot of debate lately
about the growing amount of energy needed to power the Internet, and we wanted
to weigh in on the discussion. A few months ago, I first blogged about the
about amount of energy used in one Google search. Our engineers crunched the
numbers and found that an average query uses about 1 kJ of energy and emits
about 0.2 grams of carbon dioxide. But those raw numbers don't really put the
environmental impact of searching the Internet into perspective. To add some
context, below is data about the C02 impact of some everyday activities and
items compared to Google searching:
Activity
|
Google Searches
|
CO2
emissions of an average daily newspaper (PDF) (100% recycled
paper)
|
850
|
A glass
of orange
juice
|
1,050
|
5,100
|
|
A five
mile trip in the average
U.S. automobile
|
10,000
|
A cheeseburger
|
15,000
|
Electricity
consumed by the average
U.S. household in one month
|
3,100,000
|
We work hard to provide our users with
the fastest products using the least amount of energy. We have a team of
dedicated engineers focused on designing and building the most efficient data
centers in the world. In fact, through efficiency innovations, we have managed
to cut energy usage in our data centers by over 50 percent, so we're using less
than half the energy to run our data centers as the industry average. This
efficiency means that in the time it takes to do a Google search, your own
personal computer will likely use more energy than we will use to answer your
query. And the energy used by computers is growing; people are more plugged-in
today than ever before in history. There are more than one billion PCs and
laptops currently in use, and that number is expected to grow to four billion
by 2020.
We've got cell phones, PDAs, iPods, and
GPS devices — not to mention the data centers that store all of our digital
information "in the cloud." The electricity needed to run all of our
computers, gadgets, and gizmos is growing and now accounts for half of all ICT
emissions. (ICT stands for "information and communications
technology.")
Although the amount of energy used to power ICT is growing, it's important to measure all of the ways information technology helps us save energy too. A study by The Climate Group, in fact, shows that ICT emissions pay for themselves (PDF) (and then some) by enabling significant reductions in emissions by other sectors of the economy. After all, it's much more efficient to move electrons than to move atoms. "Virtual" tools like email, video-conferencing, and search engines replace more carbon-intensive activities like snail mail, business travel, and driving.
We can still make progress at improving computing efficiency across the industry, however, and Google is committed to doing so. In 2007 we co-founded the Climate Savers Computing Initiative, a non-profit organization committed to reducing global CO2 emissions from the operation of computers by 54 million tons a year by 2010. Check out their website for more information on how you can reduce the environmental impact of your own computer use.
Although the amount of energy used to power ICT is growing, it's important to measure all of the ways information technology helps us save energy too. A study by The Climate Group, in fact, shows that ICT emissions pay for themselves (PDF) (and then some) by enabling significant reductions in emissions by other sectors of the economy. After all, it's much more efficient to move electrons than to move atoms. "Virtual" tools like email, video-conferencing, and search engines replace more carbon-intensive activities like snail mail, business travel, and driving.
We can still make progress at improving computing efficiency across the industry, however, and Google is committed to doing so. In 2007 we co-founded the Climate Savers Computing Initiative, a non-profit organization committed to reducing global CO2 emissions from the operation of computers by 54 million tons a year by 2010. Check out their website for more information on how you can reduce the environmental impact of your own computer use.
No comments:
Post a Comment